I’m glad to see you don’t believe it - for a second there I thought you were talking complete bollocks

Biker,
No drug dealers get left around to bleed to death, serves them right.

The drunk who smashes into the tree clearly has an illness - alcoholism, so it’s not his fault, he gets treated.

The smoker gets treated because he’s not breaking the law, he just goes to the bottom of the waiting list behind people who don’t make themselves ill.

The hill climber gets rescued because responsible climbers don’t need to get rescued so don’t need the same level of rescue service as people who need it.

I think you simply say at what level of crime you give up your rights, so drug dealers, rapists & distraction burglars have no rights to any service, thieves & drunks have some rights & people who drop litter can have most of the rights as everyone else.

(actually I don’t believe any of this to be honest, just venting my spleen again)

And what follows after that? Do the drug dealers not get their knees put back together after their sawn-off wielding mates blow them apart?

And then what about the drunk who smashes his car into a tree, or the smoker needing heart surgery. Do they not qualify for equal medical attention?

What about the ill-equiped hill climber who wanders off up the mountains as the weather closes in? Does this irresponsible twit not deserve the same rescue services as everyone else? Perhaps we should find out if they’ve paid their taxes first before we launch the mountain rescue team.

Actually, that last bit is not a bad idea.

Sorry.

I HATE picking up ‘mispers’ when the parents know where they are but can’t be arsed to go and get them……..