January 13th, 2010

Same old same old

Posted in The Job - Comment by 200

No sooner has Islam4UK gotten their publicity for the proposed march through Wootton Bassett, than the government have banned them. We’re led to believe that the timing is coincidental & that the government have been preparing the ban for months but the timing does appear striking.

As usual, the government’s answer to a problem is to ban it. Banning rarely works but it does grab headlines & it does fool a few people into thinking the government are actually doing something.

Banning drugs hasn’t stopped any of the problems associated with drugs use, banning dangerous dogs hasn’t stopped dangerous dogs attacking & killing people, banning handguns hasn’t stopped criminals using them, banning alcohol from under-18s doesn’t stop them maruading drunkenly through every town in the country. The only thing which has worked is banning nuclear explosions. Since Nu-Labour made it an offence to cause a nuclear explosion a few years ago, there hasn’t been a single case in the UK, mind you there wasn’t a single case prior to that but why let that spoil a success story.

So, banning Islam4UK will do precisely bugger-all. They were banned under previous names al-Ghurabaa and The Saved Sect & fuck-all good that did. Anjem Choudary will do exactly what he’s been doing for the last few years under a different guise.

The government could, in one simple act, do more to make society better than banning some randomly-named organisation with few members. They could stop giving the leader of those groups £25,000 every year of free cash.

I would normally link to the subject’s website, but it seems to have been banned.

You can skip to the end and leave a comment. Pinging is currently not allowed. RSS 2.0


  1. Graham Smith says:

    Given that they’ve apparently already been banned under two previous names, it seems likely that the activists in Islam4UK will simply reform under another new name. This is one reason why banning organisations doesn’t work in practice (although it’s good business for the spin doctors who want to make the Government look powerful).

    January 14th, 2010 at 04:54

  2. Dan H. says:

    They could always re-form under the name of “The Labour Party” and threaten to march again; it’d be fun watching the Government try to work out how to ban them then…

    January 14th, 2010 at 11:19

  3. rafanon says:

    They could always just f**k off out of this country and spout their racist hate somewhere else. I’m paying for that bunch of tossers to have a say. I’m paying for them to have a house, clothes, food NOT F***ing ALLAH YOU TWATS!

    Sorry for the rant 200 but I am seriously angry and frustrated when i’m a law abiding serviceman who just does what he needs to to get by without upsetting anyone and even risking my life for people I don’t know only to have extremist w**kers taking the piss out of people like me.

    Melv, if yuou defend thi s c**t, you’re as bad as they are.



    January 14th, 2010 at 15:14

  4. Tony F says:

    I would gladly pay for his fare to Saudia. (as a tax payer that is) I am sure they will welcome him with open prison doors….

    January 14th, 2010 at 20:17

  5. Joe says:

    Why is an apparently able bodied person like Mr A C able to pursue his hobby of imposing sharia law in the UK whilst in receipt of £25K of benefits plus residence in a £350k house under the benefits system (and indeed his fellow travellers who proudly stated that their fines (re Anglian Regt. protest) will be paid by the benefits system)? Are they perhaps taking the p**s?

    January 15th, 2010 at 00:57

Leave a comment